Women being held responsible for a man's sexual behavior and the underlying contempt and rage hidden behind this belief. Last week we had a New York ultra-Orthodox Jewish newspaper
alter a White House photo showing President Obama and
Secretary Of State Hilary Clinton during a briefing of the National Security Counsel on the raid at Osama bin Laden's compound in Pakistan. In the photo the paper published Clinton and another women there were removed. Seems the paper never publishes photos of women because it considers any photo of women to be immodest. Code for any photo of a woman is bound to be sexually dangerous.
Then this weekend Dominique Strauss-Kahn, head of the International Monetary Fund, was arrested for
sexually assaulting a maid in a hotel in New York. While reading reports of the incident in the New York newspapers I found the comment below at the tabloid paper,
The New York Post:
So much for his reputation as 'the great seducer' (he probably made that up himself and spread it around). I mean, he apparently sodomized a hotel maid - how low can you get. And his wife should step up and take some responsibility here - if she were doing her job, he wouldn't have a wandering eye. They're both trash.
Alan London- London, United Kingdom
So, according to Alan, wives are responsible when their husbands commit rape because if they were doing their job (which I assume means satisfying their husband sexually) married men wouldn't rape women at all.
What bull crap. Men are responsible for their own sexual behavior. Trying to shift the blame for a man's criminal sexual behavior onto women is absurd and an insult to the billions of men in the world who seem to be able to go though life without raping anyone and, as we all know, it is dangerous for women,too. Rape victims are usually judged as being responsible for their own rapes.
"If she hadn't dressed that way." "If she hadn't gotten that drunk." "If she hadn't made me think she wanted it."
It is time to stop this. It is time to shift the blame back to were it belongs- on the criminal. Not the victim or the wife or the mother or any other woman. Shame on that paper in New York for trying to make women invisible because, in the paper's opinion, they are so sexually dangerous; shame on Alan for being a sexist pig; and shame on society for accepting this perverted view of women as the truth.